The COP of Lugano is not commercializable but it is gainful. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems quite possible that Rossi taught IH the Lugano (false) method of > experimentation, which they continued to use and be impressed with the > amazing COPs it produced. This may have continued until they discovered it > was invalid. At that point, they may have tried further replications > getting null results. > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:02 PM Alberto De Souza < > alberto.investi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It seems that IH is responsible for a lot of what we have seen as Rossi's >> doing. >> >> Dear Janne: >> I have to comment the press release of IH, being a press release and not >> a forensic act. >> They made the Lugano reactor ( they also signed it ) they made many >> replications of which we have due record and witnesses, they made multiple >> patent applications ( without my authotization ) with their chief engineer >> as the co-inventor ( he invented nothing ) , with detailed description of >> the replications , they made replications with the attendance of Woodford, >> after which they got 50 or 60 millions of dollars from Woodfords’ >> investors, they made replications with the attendance of Chinese top level >> officers, after which they started thanks to the E-Cat they made an R&D >> activity in China in a 200 millions concern, they made replications with an >> E-Cat completely made by them under my direction the very day in which the >> 1 MW plant has been delivered in Raleigh, they made replications that we >> have recorded. After the replication they made with the attendance of >> Woodford in 2013 Mr Tom Darden said publicly: ” this replication has been >> stellar” ( witnesses available). But this is not the place to discuss this. >> We have prepared 18 volumes to explain exactly and in detail the activity >> of our “Licensee” and his acquaintances from 2013 to now. Until they had to >> collect money thanks to the E-Cat, they made replications and have been >> happy with the E-Cat; when it turned to have to pay, they discovered that >> they never made replications, that the ERV that they had chosen with us was >> not good, that the test on the 1 MW plant, thanks to which they collected >> enormous amounts of money from the investors and where I put at risk my >> health working 16-18 hours per day was not a good test ( but for all the >> year of the test they NEVER said a single word of complaint, even if they >> had constantly their men in the plant, etc etc. But the worse has still to >> come out. The worse is in the 18 volumes we will present in due time, in >> due place. A blog is not the right place to discuss a litigation. This is >> only a quick answer to the press release made by IH. >> Ad majora. >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> >
