Adrian Ashfield … is English your second language or do you simply prefer not to understand it when it fits your puerile agenda? Why not go back and read the posts before making a further obnoxious jerk out of yourself.
You stated in response to the original post on Wang's headline: "Seems 90% thought the article was biased and wrong". When I checked on the comments to verify your version, the negativists are nowhere near 90% and seem to have screen names like masterblaster, nightcreature, oystea, jarea, etc. and to me, those are anonymous fan-boys names, at least when they show extreme gullibility and anti-science attitude, accepting everything they are told by a consummate con-artist and fraudster. How can anyone respond seriously to a masterblaster? Yes - I do realize that "goat-guy" is also a screen name, but from his long string of intelligent postings over the years, he is certainly not among your so-called 90%. So you are clearly wrong on the percentages … but who takes you seriously anyway since you seldom try to understand? Your gullibility completely overwhelms any scientific contribution you might try to make here, at least based on rereading some of your prior posts. You seem to want to come-off as politically well-connected and involved in executive decisions, but all I see is bluster and ignorance. As to your prior arguments with Tom Clarke … LOL… you come off like a complete fool. You are way out of your league. My advice for this forum is: Get lost and go back to the adoring fan-boy cliques where they love your kind of tripe. If you decide to stay, then when the truth comes out about this most recent version of the Rossi scam and it will not be long - I will demand an apology every time you post your childish anti-science nonsense. -----Original Message----- From: a.ashfield I note you didn't answer the question. You bitched about "anonymous fanboys" but can't name them. You specialize in ad hominems and ignore facts that are contrary to your preconceived beliefs.. You libel Rossi calling him a fraud when you have no proof of that. How can you write off the ERV's report when you haven't even seen it? Russ George wrote: "Indeed, those using screen names are scurrilous louses in every way perfectly defined as trolls. It is those of us who feed them by responding to them who keep them around to poison the internet.
