On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Teslaalset <robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Rossi points out that the 'old' conditions in the agreement are still met > (implemented with hotcat methods) and that IH therefore should fulfil the > agreed payment. For IH this hotcat knowledge transfer is not profitable > anymore now Rossi has his x-cat technology in his pocket. An idea that occurred to me, perhaps related to this, is that (a) Rossi has been approached by new investors but is currently bound by agreements with IH, and (b) IH are stalling on making good on their side of the deal, because they don't think the testing has been rigorous. How this scenario plays out is that Rossi sees himself as in a position of strength, so as soon as IH failed to pay, he terminated the agreement and launched the suit in order to recover damages, so that he could proceed unhindered with the new venture. Eric
