A real client happy of making usual production of real things, is really a good evidence. An industrial production line is designed to make the most product for the least heat, so if the production is good, the bill is low, and the ratio much above margin of error, then I can trust.
The problem is only to have a real client, and not a shell company hiring an actor. If the factory is making steam cake, all I need to the number of cake and the electric bill. provided the client is really an industrialists who optimised his production line since long. if ratio is >4, that is good. if the client is not real, situation is desperate. We don't have the data to be sure. all i see is someone owning license on a goose laying golden goose who flee like a chicken. This is indirect data. 2016-04-14 23:36 GMT+02:00 Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com>: > Siferkol reported in April 2015 > https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/news/index.php/News/91-Sifferk%C3%B6ll-First-Hand-Information-from-Visitors-of-the-Industrial-Heat-E-Cat-Cus/ > > I know first hand from very reliable sources that themselves have visited > the Rossi/Industrial Heat > <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/wiki/index.php/Entry/7-Industrial-Heat/?s=7a60fd77d6c0504834cf10dd13ad62cb7d0b0cb0> > E-Cat customer that the plant works very well. This has been verified both > by measurements made by the customer and by significantly reduced > electricity bills. The plant seems to be able to produce heat from > electricity with a COP in the range of 20-80 depending on the level of > self-sustain-mode applied. I guess that is what Rossi is working on right > now. > > The implications of COP in this range is of course nothing less than … > revolutionary … ”a tipping point” to quote Tom Darden > > This is a good day! > > Mats Lewan confirmed : UPDATE: Since a COP (Coefficient of Performance — > output energy/input energy) ranging from 20 to 80 has been reported, I can > confirm that I have got the same information. > > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Jed Rothwell" <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > *To: *"vortex-l" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent: *Thursday, April 14, 2016 11:40:18 AM > *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb > > a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > > >> You write about claims of a COP of 80. My recollection was that it >> peaked at 60 and we don't really know what the average was. > > > You may be right. I tend to get numbers wrong. > > - Jed > >
