On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins > > Ø What you describe is certainly an interesting and scary > proposition - that protons could be sheared or broken apart. However, it > is hard to imagine a number of thing in this hypothesis and that of > Olafssen/Holmlid. First of all, where did the potential energy come from > to put two hydrogen nuclei in 2.3pm proximity? > > This idea by Jones is close to the truth. In most cases, hexagonal crystal structure forms a template for how the nanowire of metalized hydrogen will form. Rossi uses mica, and others uses quartz. > > Ø Second, SPP is an electron resonance at a metal/dielectric > interface, but the electrons themselves are in the metal (AFIK). How would > these electrons that are in the metal (resonant in SPP or not) be complicit > in a UDD/UDH breakup? > SPP is not a ring of electrons. they are a ring of photons that are entangled with electrons that are still in the dipole connected to a hole in the metal lattice. The electron is not physically co-located with the ball of light. SPPs are a light plasmoid. The SPP is a quantum fluid that produces a monopole flux tube. See Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf Ø Thirdly, why would UDD/UDH be stable? > The SPP produces a monopole flux tube the confines the metalized hydrogen nanowire. The SPPs form a Bose condinsate on the outside of the hydrogen nanowire. It is that SPP condensate that keeps the structure of the RM together. A photo condinsate stores energy as the photons gain mass and slow down. Photons actually gain mass in a condinsate of light. I whote a post on all this as follows: https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3009-Dualism-makes-LENR-go/ also see my posts here https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3007-LENR-Cage-entrapment-hypothesis/
