Hi guys, I see no reason to decide the outcome just a few weeks before the proof will be there. One way or the other. Yes, I understand the disappointment as most of us would have expected a clear situation by now. I am also optimistic. Who is more believable? There are too much money involved to believe that anyone is forthcoming. I agree with that IH has a lot to lose if they do not play within the rules and that is the fact that I have a little doubt. It is in my opinion rather poorly handled in general. Why after several weeks are there no negotiations going on? If IH are seriously believers in LENR then they certainly would have found a mediator who could talk to Rossi and then continue there own path in LENR. Rossi cannot just sit back as that will eliminate his lawsuit. We can agree something is fishy and it should be taken care of - old fish smells. Maybe it is underway in a silent format.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> In recent years, Rossi has in fact done what he said he would do. >> > > Not a chance. Just looking at the facility you know there cannot be a 1 MW > heat source in it. It would cook everyone in that part of the building. > That is enough heat for 100 dry cleaning machines. You couldn't fit that > many in such a small area, never mind operating them. > > > >> You have no proof that the 1 MW plant didn't work and I remain >> optimistic about new developments. >> > > I.H. says they have proof. Based on my experience dealing with I.H. and > Rossi, I find I.H. far more believable. > > - Jed > >
