Jed wrote:
"In recent years, Rossi has in fact done what he said he would do.
Not a chance. Just looking at the facility you know there cannot be a 1
MW heat source in it. It would cook everyone in that part of the
building. That is enough heat for 100 dry cleaning machines. You
couldn't fit that many in such a small area, never mind operating them.
You have no proof that the 1 MW plant didn't work and I remain
optimistic about new developments.
I.H. says they have proof. Based on my experience dealing with I.H. and
Rossi, I find I.H. far more believable."
I don't find unofficial third party reports on a case this large to be
very convincing. How do you know that was the site? Why would IH show
it off to Woodford if it were just a sham? Why would Rossi sue IH
knowing that the details would come out in court? Why would IH wait a
year and not just shut it down if it didn't work? Etc.
There are just too many unknowns to jump to conclusions, particularly
when we will have more data in a month or so.
