Title: Message
Fred -
 
Cover the bottom with something non-rotating.
 
I built a small centrifuge a while back for casting small plastic parts with thick resin, 1728rpm motor, disk 12" or so in diameter. The flat disk (no skirt) was fully exposed above but was recessed into a box with the motor underneath so the bottom was exposed to the inside of the closed box. Lost about a pound of weight when run, which seemed like a lot for such a small gizmo.
 
I wonder how a freely rotating air-blocking disk mounted on an axle on the underside of a frisbee would affect performance. Maybe try it on one with no skirt - the 1-element flying Tesla turbine. Give it a little counterspin before throwing.
 
- R.
-----Original Message-----
From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 3:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Dash Files for LENR Patent

Rick Monteverde wrote:
 
 " I bet that would work! Though simply spinning the disk would pull in air over the surface due to dragging from the boundary layer (beta ether again), so the added mechanical complexity of a blower isn't even necessary. Yes, I think I'll call it the "Freely Rotating Intake Surface Beta Ether Engine", or FRISBEE for short."
 
Cool Rick. Too bad I didn't think of it.  :-)
 
OTOH if you spin just a disk without a skirt (inverted stock tanks have
a skirt) it will be symmetrical and cancel.
 
Got a pie tin, mini motor and a digital scale?
 
A long time ago before Frisbees, we used to toss the metal caps off asphalt roofing
rolls impressive distances. But our dog knew better than catching them.
 
Fred
 

Reply via email to