Jed States: "If the ERV say in court that he thinks the terms were met, he should pack his bags and take the first airplane for Italy as soon as he leaves the stand, to avoid being arrested for perjury and fraud."
This judgement seems to be very harsh, cruel, damaging, and severe. This statement causes me to wonder what the basis of this hostile feeling about a complete stranger comes from. There is no case made to support this reaction and no logic that leads to it. As far as my opinion on the law that applies in this case, I simply want to go on the record with an opinion based on logic and research. Oftentime, experts are kind enough to correct or agree with the offered option and the logic that underlies that opinion. The reaction to this opinion then transforms into a opportunity for learning. How you reach your feelings appears to be based on hearsay from one of the parties in this dispute. You seem to be inured to the self serving motives that might produce this information from such people. I hope that they are not betraying your trust, reputation, friendship, and good nature. On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The Judge is going to ask IH if they gave the ERV absolute authority as >> the agent of arbitration to determine if the terms of the licence agreement >> were met. Then the Judge will ask the ERV if he has determined if the terms >> of the Licence agreement were met. . . . >> > > Are you the judge? A friend of the judge, perhaps? > > Are you a lawyer? Because if you are, I am surprised you passed the bar. > Every lawyer I have asked thinks that what you are saying is nonsense, and > they think you have no idea what you are talking about. > > If the ERV say in court that he thinks the terms were met, he should pack > his bags and take the first airplane for Italy as soon as he leaves the > stand, to avoid being arrested for perjury and fraud. > > - Jed > >
