On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote:
As it comes to if Rossi's claims are real or not. I do not know but much of > his behavior tells me he is a real guy and as most inventors / > entrepreneurs hard to deal with. They are by nature hardnosed and outside > ghe box. Consider this detail: from what is now publicly available about how the 1MW test has proceeded since early on, Rossi has not made an effort to persuade IH of the truth of anything. He has proceeded above their objections like a man on a mission, checking off the checkboxes in the license agreement and perhaps trying to hew to the letter of it (although not exactly, as we see with the switch to the four "tiger" modules). If we are to assume rational behavior on some level, which is not guaranteed, one of the following conclusions is hard to escape: 1. Rossi assumed that IH would pay up, whether or not IH believed the 1MW test was persuasive; or 2. Rossi assumed that IH would not pay, in which case Rossi would sue and then either obtain the full amount through the judgment of the court, or IH would settle for some lesser amount out of court. What is not listed in these possibilities is that Rossi would try to make a convincing, rigorous case to IH or to the court that there was a LENR reaction producing 1MW, with a COP of 6 (or 50). Eric
