No Jed I do not know the results. I know not to spout firm controversial judgment. the without support. I am sure you know. I am less sure of you judgment, based on your vague bak up of your statements On May 20, 2016 17:29, "Jed Rothwell" <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote: > >> Jed, if I had nothing I should say nothing. >> Vague data and very mean conclusion. >> > There is nothing vague about it! Rossi's own numbers show the temperature > of the fluid is just above 100°C. That is his own data, in the Lewan > interview. What more can you ask for? He did not quote the pressure, > because that would show it is hot water. That plus other data shows it is > below 100°C. There is no steam! > > >> There is no win in that behavior regardless of if you are right or wrong. >> Just reflects back on you. >> > I am telling you clear-cut facts, confirmed by Rossi himself. > > Furthermore, you are evading, dancing around the issues, and refusing to > face reality when you will not admit that Rossi's blocking the door to the > customer factory proves beyond any question that he is a fraud. If there > was a machine in there consuming 1 MW of process heat he would be thrilled > to show it. It would be the first thing he shows everyone. There can be > NOTHING in there. > > Your blather and evasions are tiresome. Rossi torpedoed himself in that > interview. He inadvertently proved once and for all that there is no heat, > and that the test was fake. > > If you disagree, tell us why he would refuse to show definitive proof of > his own claim. Go ahead, give a reason. Amuse us. Rossi himself has not > even tried to invent a reason. He just says "it isn't important." Do you > buy that? Do you think it is not important? Why do you let Rossi feed you > such arrogant, foolish nonsense? > > - Jed > >