I have rejoined vortex briefly to express a couple of cents. I don't expect
to stay her long. It's too damned addictive.

 

OK... Regarding the latest Rossi vs I.H. saga:

 

Having observed Jed's eclectic contributions to the Vort Collective since
the 1990s it's been my experience that few Vort members have been as
thorough, meticulously so, or as objective, as Mr. Rothwell has been when it
comes to evaluating basic calorimetry. Because I'm not an expert in
calorimetry it behooves me to carefully evaluate the opinions and
assessments of those who, in my opinion, are experienced experts in the
field. Having observed the quality of Mr. Rothwell's posts for more than
three decades I have no problem yielding to most of his extensive experience
(and opinion) on such matters. I should also mention that I'm willing to
listen to Ed Storm's opinions and evaluations as well,. I gather Ed may have
possibly concluded a very different scenario concerning Rossi's alleged
professional proclivities. Evaluating Mr. Rothwell's opinions, combined with
Ed Storms, and perhaps a few others can certainly give me a lot to chew on!

 

I am not in a position to determine whether Rossi is or isn't a fraud.
Meanwhile, Jed has access to crucial I.H. calorimetric data that most of us
in the peanut gallery don't possess. Jed appears to have come to the
conclusion that Rossi's recent actions concerning his dealings with I.H.
indicate strong fraudulent activity. Again, I yield to Jed's extensive
experience (and opinion) concerning calorimetric issues while I also
continue to keep Ed Storm's opinions on the matter in the mixture as well.

 

One can come up with a million different reasons as to why we flawed human
beings occasionally behave in seemingly evasive and dishonest ways. Buyer
beware.

 

While I remain fascinated by this latest Rossi saga, a saga which is still
unfolding, I find myself even more fascinated by the amount of bargaining
(of the Elisabeth Kubler-Ross kind) that I see coming from certain Vort
participants as they go about challenging Mr. Rothwell's, latest Rossi
criticisms. I remain fascinated that some of these posters seem incapable of
entertaining the possibility that Rossi's calorimetric claims might indeed
be worthless, or worse, possibly even fraudulent. Why is it important to
cast so much doubt on Mr. Rothwell's latest Rossi assessments? I can think
of one possibility:

 

As a former member of Dr. Mills SCP Yahoo group I observed a lot of smart
observant posters occasionally asking difficult questions of the good
doctor. Unfortunately, I also observed a lot of hero worshiping of the good
doctor. I suspect certain posts I made concerning observations I made that
seemed to suggest there existed an ardent cheerleading section may have
contributed to me being kicked out by Dr. Mills himself. Lately, I see a
similar kind of hero worshipping occurring within the Vort Collective among
certain posters. I find myself wondering what are the chances are that any
of these worshipers have accumulated anywhere near the amount of
calorimetric experience that Mr. Rothwell has accumulated. Under the
circumstances, what can an ardent worshipper do? One option is to fall back
on a relentless campaign of Elisabeth Kubler-Ross bargaining against Jed's
calorimetric evaluations. 

 

I suspect Jed will eventually tire of participating in this futile tactic
since it seems clear to me that worshipers have no intention of abandoning
their currently chosen idol. I'm astounded that Jed hasn't already given up
on this futile task.

 

At present I lack sufficient evidence to arrive at a conclusion that
suggests ALL of Rossi's experimental devices have never worked. I realize I
could be wrong on this point but I still find it plausible to speculate that
Rossi may have indeed discovered excess heat emanating from some of his
earlier experiments. Jed can correct me on this point but I believe he have
at one time also speculated on that possibility. I leads me to speculate
that after all these years Rossi may still have very little or no control at
all over this illusive beast. He may still have very little clue as to how
to properly control and commercially exploit his discovery. To me, that
might be the real crux of the Rossi enigma. The lack of control continues to
hound Rossi's dreams of striking it rich. I could see how such a scenario
could turn out to be a difficult, messy, unscrupulous affair as Rossi tries
to entice additional investors into funding his dream of eventually riding
this illusive Pegasus into the blue sky while being forced to insinuate
(perhaps even lie) that he has already captured and tamed the mythical
beast. I could see how such a scenario might explain a LOT of Rossi's
unscrupulous behavior. I don't mean to imply that I condone such
evasiveness.

 

Meanwhile, there's always Occam's Razor to keep in mind. Occam suggests
Rossi is simply a fraud. It would seem the best thing I can do for now is to
continue juggling both of these viewpoints in my head. I will continue
juggling them for as long as both are willing to cohabitate within the
confines of my rattling head. But eventually, one of them will have to be
kicked out.

 

I remain exasperated. It seems to me that all Rossi really has to do to
vindicate himself is prove to the world that his latest disputed
calorimetric claims are more accurate than the evidence I.H. claims it
possesses. Unfortunately, I'm acquiring the disquieting suspicion that we
who reside in the honorable peanut gallery may never get to see both sides
of the evidence, side-by-side. We may never be able to make an adequate
comparison.

 

What Rossi's behavior tells me, more than anything, is that I shouldn't
invest a single dime of my paltry investments with him. I find his actions
to be too unreliable.

 

Regards,

Steven Vincent Johnson

orionworks.com

http://www.zazzle.com/orionworks

http://stevenvincentjohnson.bandcamp.com/

 

Reply via email to