Interesting how they are able to design a pair of magnets to either attract until they repel or to repel until they attract. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLZMJYqEdQw
Harry On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:31 PM, H LV <[email protected]> wrote: > More examples of programmable magnets > > https://youtu.be/IANBoybVApQ?t=2m14s > > Harry > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:46 PM, H Ucar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This demonstation of 'correlated magnetic phenomenon' is not working >> as explained. Obviously if magnets allowed to move freely they arrange >> their positions for attraction only and they will stick. Otherwise >> they had found a way to circumvent the Earnshaw theorem. >> >> On 5/28/16, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: H Ucar >> > >> >> I experimentally show oscillatory magnetic interaction between dipole >> >> bodies exhibits strong repulsion at short distance therefore provides >> >> eqilibrium for the bound state in presence of attractive magnetic or >> >> electric forces... This mechanism could be the origin of weak and >> strong >> >> interactions without requiring new forces or glue particles.... Since >> the >> >> bound states through magnetic interactions are fully dynamic, it might >> be >> >> possible to disturb or break it easier than if based on static >> forces.... >> > >> > >> > This is insightful - and I agree with the general conclusion despite the >> > vast difference in scale, when moving from centimeters to angstroms. The >> > same point is also made by the "correlated magnetic" phenomenon, in >> which >> > "repel" and "attract" functions are coded into a single magnet, which >> does >> > both depending on relative position. >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POc32aioLFE >> > >> > The strong and weak force could be a similar situation - with the >> so-called >> > 5th force being a relic of one or the other. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >
