On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If the instrumentation was so contentious then IH should not have allowed >> the year long test to go forward . . . >> > > Apparently they could not stop it. I do not know why. I know nothing at > all about the contract or agreements or why Rossi ended up in charge. > > > >> . . . or at least they should have formally told Rossi that they would >> not respect the results of the test even if Rossi insisted on performing >> the test. >> > > I am sure they did tell him that! > You know they did, or you presume they did? Harry > They also told to the general public on March 10, before the lawsuit was > filed, in this statement: > > > http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=1741 > > No one in his right mind would respect the results of this test. > > - Jed > >
