Ah. You're sure of it so that's case settled. Can I borrow your
crystal ball sometime?
On 6/4/2016 10:30 PM, H LV wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
H LV <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If the instrumentation was so contentious then IH should not
have allowed the year long test to go forward . . .
Apparently they could not stop it. I do not know why. I know
nothing at all about the contract or agreements or why Rossi ended
up in charge.
. . . or at least they should have formally told Rossi that
they would not respect the results of the test even if Rossi
insisted on performing the test.
I am sure they did tell him that!
You know they did, or you presume they did?
Harry
They also told to the general public on March 10, before the
lawsuit was filed, in this statement:
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=1741
No one in his right mind would respect the results of this test.
- Jed
