Eric,
25 days before the lawsuit and only about a couple of weeks from the end
of the test, presumably Rossi did not know IH were not going to pay
up. When did the EVR finish his report?
Rossi's 18 volumes of evidence are his notebooks. He would keep these
as a record anyway. Nothing strange about that.
You keep on about the anonymous IH "expert" not being allowed access to
the customer. We have been through this countless times. It is not
necessary to know how the heat was used when measuring the output of a
black box. Jed even admits that. Sounds like you are applying your
first law again.
On 6/5/2016 5:54 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:38 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Rossi said on his blog all was well with IH in the early days. He
surely would not say that now.
Yes, and Rossi said the following on March 11, only 25 days before he
initiated a lawsuit against IH:
Thank you for spotting this issue: there is absolutely no divorce
between Leonardo Corporation and any of its Licensees, included
Industrial Heat. Industrial Heat is the legitimate licensee of
Leonardo Corporation for its Territory and I never referred to any
possible divorce. I invite anybody to disregard any innuendo,
supposition, speculation related to the licenses of Leonardo
Corporation unless they are communicated directly from Leonardo
Corporation. There is some imbecile that tries to get audience
inventing situations that do not exist. [1]
On April 7, two days after the suit was filed, Rossi claimed to have
18 volumes of evidence in support of the case [2]. Did everything go
terribly wrong between March 11 and April 5, and did Rossi amass those
18 volumes during the intervening time? You will need to decide
whether these and other statements are true and benign, or misleading,
or false. Rossi says many things.
If the output temperature was 116C and the steam superheated,
really all you would need to calculate the thermal output would be
a flow meter for the water going in, a pressure gauge and a
thermocouple to measure the steam temperature. Very basic, easy to
do things. That is neglecting the heat required to heat the water
to boiling, as was agreed as a conservative measure. Jed says he
knows what the instrumentation was. Perhaps he will describe it.
This is not like Rossi's earlier demos where the output was barely
above 100C.
One awaits reliable data upon which to do calculations, which, when
obtained, will be interesting to see. But since IH's expert was not
allowed access to the customer area, there is no assurance, given what
we know, that there was even a closed circuit.
Eric
[1]
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=71#comment-1158228
[2]
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=89#comment-1169740
