On 06/06/2016 10:26 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The test proved beyond doubt that the device does not work. I repeat: IT DOES NOT WORK. There is no excess heat. At no time in this test did the device show excess heat. You could watch it for a half hour, or you could collect 6 months of data and you would reach the same conclusion. _It was not working_.
Jed, I believe you have information that indicates this is true. However, it just doesn't explain the unusual behavior from IH. What about all the previous tests, going back to 2012? Why raise money at all, if they weren't certain? Isn't that a type of fraud? Why sign the patent applications? Why sign the agreement with Rossi which gives Rossi's guy complete control over the final test? Why hire Rossi's other guy to observe this test? What was their role in the Lugano test? Didn't they build the reactor for that?
For a solution to be correct, all the pieces have to fit into place, and if money wasn't a factor in this, then things just don't all fit together for me. I know we'll have more information as time goes on. I'm happy waiting for it.
Craig
