Harry,
If true, it implies IH didn't want to pay $89 million. It is not just
that that is a lot of money, but it would mean Rossi could then build
his automated production line and IH would have lost control.
On 6/6/2016 12:21 AM, H LV wrote:
If it is true that IH offered to pay Rossi a sum of money to the
cancel the test then that implies IH considered Rossi's IP to be
valuable at that time.
Harry
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 10:41 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Eric & Jed,
Consider the time line
Summer 2015 Rossi was offered a sum to cancel the test
Rossi's counter offer was to return the $11.5 million paid and
cancel IH's license.
Feb 18 test of a one megawatt heat plant completed
Apr 05 Rossi sues. Rossi et al v. Darden et al
May 15 date Penon report given to Rossi and D/IH (hard to pin
down exact date)
June 2 Leonardo Corp terminated license with IH
So Rossi sued Darden before either party had received the Penon's
report.
Rossi would not sue IH without getting a strong indication that IH
were not going to pay him
As for IH then feeding critics propaganda about how Penon's
report was rubbish see Sifferkoll for names like Dewey Weaver (&
possibly Jed)
