a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> - not enough signatures, so a working MW reactor doesn’t matter. It > came too late. > > I.H. claims it does not work. If it worked, they would pay $89 million. Regardless of whether it actually works or not, Sifforkoll should not misrepresent I.H.'s position. I.H. did *not* say "a working MW reactor doesn't matter." They said, "the reactor is inoperative." > - IH can distribute IP as they wish … [because of malicious wording in > the license] > - IH can file patents as they wish … [because of malicious wording in > the license] > > Malicious or not, if that is what the license says, Rossi cannot sue for it now. It is too late. And do not say, "it is too late for I.H. because Penon says it works." Whether the gadget works or not is a matter of fact that must be established by expert testimony. If the experts convince the judge or jury that Penon is wrong, Penon is overruled. Whereas what the license says is cut and dry, and cannot be overruled. - Jed
