Yes, but sadly people are jumping the gun in interpreting this. Seems like probably just something that they have to do should the judge rule it will go to trial. But, I don't know that either. Best to wait to hear from the judge.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:34 PM Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry but this document is not a ruling on the motion to dismiss. > > If there has been such an ruling, where is it? > > It is doubtful that the motion to dismiss has been heard, since it was > only filed recently. > > This document does not imply that the motion has been heard. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: a.ashfield > > The motion to dismiss has been rejected. Rossi v. Darden will go to a > trial by jury starting on Sept 18th 2018 > > > http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0020.1.pdf > > > >
