Bob,
The other side of the argument is this. Rossi would not agree to the
deal for just ~$11 million and was counting on the $89 million. The
terms were set out for the trial in two agreements (that Ampernergo
didn't sign was a red herring).
The terms were the success of the trial would be judged by the ARV
Pennon. Apparently his report was favorable. Legally it is not clear
if it matters whether Pennon was right, rather like a referee in a
sporting event, unless it can be shown Pennon altered the results
deliberately..
Rossi was the one to take this to court and if his E-Cats didn't work
why on earth would do that? He could have walked with what was left of
the $11 million. It looks to me that IH may be missing something in how
to operate them and in these circumstances it gets dodgy for them to
claim the rights for the next generation QuarkX that Rossi developed
independently.
On 7/1/2016 3:59 PM, Bob Higgins wrote:
It is interesting and self-destructive that Rossi appears to have
unilaterally declared that the license sold to IH is null and void.
Having accepted money for that license, he is in a legally binding
contract. Yet Rossi seems intent to market that license to others as
though he had no other contract. This is clearly fraud, and a fraud
that will quickly put Rossi back in jail for a good long contemplative
period. He should be collecting his reading material on antigravity.
I couldn't help myself.
