Sorry in the face of the constant tirades in the field there was no good reason to reveal other metal pathways, Pd has proven sufficient to keep the competitors and trolls well fed and directed.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 1:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:It Just Works - Simple engineering scale up for PdD wet cold fusion In reply to Russ George's message of Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:03:29 -0700: Hi Russ, [snip] >It is bothersome how so many in the LENR field offer nothing but disdain for PdD wet cells. It seems to me that MP's boiling cell might be readily engineered to become a useful commercial product. (Mitch Swartz's Nanor's might work as well.) Take for example it the cell nominally occupies 2cc of volume in a massive array. Each piece of Pd in a common pool of D2O held under very high pressure and thus higher temperature would contribute to the sum of heat produced at say 10 watts per unit. Gather 100,000 unit cells together and the system would produce a million watts. Share the electrical power amongst the units via a duty cycle allowing a tiny fraction of the power to be required to keep them fusing and the OU output ratio, COP, would be spectacular. > > > >In my work producing prodigious heat and helium using transient asymmetric cavitation fusion (TACF) where observed outputs of hundreds of watts was routinely achieved a similar massive array would easily perform in the same way in a highly pressurized reactor vessel to allow higher temperature operation. Nice thing about my TACF, (pronounced tac-f) is titanium was a superb metal, better than palladium, not nearly so good as silver but silver's fusion reactivity is so high that it is nigh unto impossible to keep it intact as it melts almost instantly (in room temp D2)) when loaded with D2 and activated. I there a paper on the silver experiment? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
