Still working on it and making great progress but as you must know the world 
follows the law “Good, fast, or cheap – choose any two.” Many of us refuse to 
do anything but ‘good’ work and in the face of the tirades of trolls and 
establishments to say nothing of the pesky secret world ramifications whose 
actions shall remain secret as they make abundantly clear as a result “cheap” 
is the box most active experimentalists are kept in.

 

One of Rossi’s great contributions has been to illustrate how this is not a 
technology developed with chicken feed, it demands substantial funding to 
engage in even the obvious and simple engineering development. Well of course I 
speak of insignificant engineering development cost compared to other 
disruptive technologies but still many millions not the pocket change that is 
spoken of on forums on the net.

 

From: Teslaalset [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 12:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:It Just Works - Simple engineering scale up for PdD wet cold 
fusion

 

What happened with your work Russ? 

Why wasn’t it taken to the next level?

 

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Russ George <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

It is bothersome how so many in the LENR field offer nothing but disdain for 
PdD wet cells. It seems to me that MP’s boiling cell might be readily 
engineered to become a useful commercial product. (Mitch Swartz’s Nanor’s might 
work as well.) Take for example it the cell nominally occupies 2cc of volume in 
a massive array. Each piece of Pd in a common pool of D2O held under very high 
pressure and thus higher temperature would contribute to the sum of heat 
produced at say 10 watts per unit. Gather 100,000 unit cells together and the 
system would produce a million watts. Share the electrical power amongst the 
units via a duty cycle allowing a tiny fraction of the power to be required to 
keep them fusing and the OU output ratio, COP, would be spectacular.

 

In my work producing prodigious heat and helium using transient asymmetric 
cavitation fusion (TACF) where observed outputs of hundreds of watts was 
routinely achieved a similar massive array would easily perform in the same way 
in a highly pressurized reactor vessel to allow higher temperature operation. 
Nice thing about my TACF, (pronounced tac-f) is titanium was a superb metal, 
better than palladium, not nearly so good as silver but silver’s fusion 
reactivity is so high that it is nigh unto impossible to keep it intact as it 
melts almost instantly (in room temp D2)) when loaded with D2 and activated.

 

 

Reply via email to