Some few here have remarkably selective notions of what is reality. First off IH did not just engage with Rossi on a moment’s notice they worked with him over an extended period of time developing their trust in what he claimed and they wanted to invest in. The got involved with his technology in multiple steps. Now it seems that any puerile dilettante can surmise that Rossi’s technology does not and never did work as reported. IH is touted as being supremely capable of determining this but yet over years of engagement and stepwise investment they never did until the very last minute and even then were simply delaying any action until Rossi acted. All the while IH was happily hosting other people through to see and visit with Rossi and his technology with grand success as those ‘other people’ contributed scores of millions into IH’s hands. Now the dilettantes raise a ruckus in this meaningless social media forum with all manner of text book spin mastering bullshit… me thinks the ladies protest too much. Nah they aren’t ladies at all they are clearly whores.
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Reality check of the day From: a.ashfield Do you believe Pons & Fleischmann showed excess heat in their original experiment? Despite the "expert" hot fusion physicists from MIT and CalTech claims? Actually, if you are familiar with the history of the field – and the name Gene Mallove of Infinite Energy magazine, you would realize that MIT did indeed replicate P&F, did find excess heat, and did “recalibrate” the results to look like a null experiment. That is fact. And more relevant to the Rossi case, that Chuck Haldeman, the highly respected senior engineer at Lincoln Labs (MIT) twenty years ago, fully replicated the nickel hydrogen experiments of Mills at fairly high gain. Again, MIT refused to publish his results for fear of losing hot fusion funding. That is fact. Thus, it is very likely that Rossi “could have” and even “should have” witnessed thermal gain at some point in his progress, especially before Focardi died, but either could not, or would not, share that result at a later date with IH. He may have been playing them for fools, as the motivation for not sharing is completely mysterious. In any event, it is hard to imagine what happened to make Rossi decide not to demonstrate gain if he was able to do so - for IH. But if is pretty clear to any reasonable person, that if Rossi can do it now – it is self-destructive not to turn over a working device to a competent scientist. To hell with trade secrets, he is finished, otherwise. Rossi may have over-played his hand, thinking IH were complete fools, who knows? I can tell you that there is no valid legal reason that he could not supply one of his old working cells, if he has one, to an independent physicist for testing, despite the ongoing case. University of Miami has a competent physics program.
