No. All I have from IH is second hand information from you that Murray
says. I have pointed out errors in exhibit 5.
IH claim Vaughn was not a manager at Cherokee, but he claims he was on
his resume. You can't even tell how people could "see" the pipe was
half full. You can't provide a piping diagram.
I have seen photos of the plant, read Rossi's replies to hundreds of
questions and heard and seen his interviews.
I have followed Rossi's demonstrations over the years and so have a fair
outline of what his reactors are like.
How well the plant performed has yet to be proven but I expect that it
will be made known. I'm not about to leap to a conclusion until the
facts are presented.
I know nothing about Industrial Heat LLD except they did a deal with
Rossi that has gone bad.
On 8/10/2016 6:04 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
So all you have is Murray says?
And others, some of whom I trust a great deal.
All you have is Rossi. His credibility is zero to several significant
decimal digits.
Think about this. Rossi has given you nothing at all. Not a single
technical detail. You learned the flow rate, the flow meter type, the
temperatures, and many other details from me and from I.H. Not one
item has been confirmed by Rossi, or denied by him. He might have
earned $89 million with a valid rebuttal of the issues raised in
Exhibit 5, but he said _nothing_.
Since you do not believe us, and since Rossi has given you nothing,
you have nothing to go on, and no evidence to discuss or evaluate. You
have no basis to reach any conclusions, since you reject all
information from us. You have made several guesses and assumptions,
but they are wrong. You are wasting your time. You might as well bow
out of the conversation.
- Jed
