Nobody saw the pipe was half full unless they had X-Ray eyes. All you
have is Murray says about stains.
Show a diagram of the piping.
t looks like all the voluminous secret data you had boils down to just
the above - and you apparently don't even have a piping diagram that you
can show us.
On 8/10/2016 4:58 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
David Roberson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Jed,I do not see any obvious reason why the flow meter can not be
lower than the reservoir.
Of course it could have been lower, and it should have been. But it
was not. If it had been, it would not have been half full. Observers
saw that it was half full. They saw rust stains, as described in
Exhibit 5.
Rossi claimed it was lower than the reservoir. As I recall he said
this after they informed him that it was half full. He was lying, as
he often does. (I am not sure of the timeline. Perhaps someone more
diligent than I could check into who said what when. Exhibit 5 was
provided to Penon on March 25, 2016.)
This is mere speculation on my part but . . .
With this configuration I can see that it would be easy to confirm the
flow rate by other methods, circumventing the flowmeter. It should
also be fairly easy to confirm that the pipe is half full by various
methods. So, I assume experts from I.H. did these things. I have not
heard that from anyone, so I could be wrong.
- Jed
