On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Craig Haynie <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 08/11/2016 06:21 PM, Che wrote: > > > > But this is the point: You can't prove that we live in an Objective >> Universe. You can't prove that you're not in some computer simulation, and >> that the people around you are real. You can't prove your axioms. That's >> why they're axioms. We take it on faith that what appears to be an >> objective Universe, with rules which are the same for everyone, is true. >> >> Craig >> >> > Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proofs. Your metaphysical claims > demand more than intellectual wankerism. > > > I'm not making an extraordinary claim. You are! You're claiming we live in > an objective Universe; a claim you can't prove. > > Axioms can't be proven either way. This is why they are axioms. Otherwise, > they would be deductions from other axioms. > > Craig > Medieval Schoolman logic in response to Science marks its return...
