The flow meter flow values implies that the steam flow control logic might not have affected the pump speeds used to circulate water between the reactor and the company. Do you have the piping layout?
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> There must have been an "heat on demand" relationship between the >> customer and the reactor such that the demand for heat varied with the >> "maximum heat production rate" being limited to 3.66 gallons per second. >> Rossi's reactor control mechanism must self throttle to reduce heat >> production based on demand. >> > Wrong. Rossi's data shows almost exactly the same level of heat production > every day for the entire test. Even on days when Rossi himself said the > reactor was turned off it produced a steady 1 MW. So there was no control > on demand. > > Of course, Rossi's data is impossible and manifestly fake. He actually > only produced ~20 kW. But if you are going to indulge in a fantasy, you > should stick to the pretend information that Rossi gave you. When you do an > analysis of Harry Potter you don't get to make up new characters or magic > powers not described in the book. When you discuss Rossi's preposterous > claims and you make up imaginary justifications for them, you have to stick > to his claims, and those claims rule out heat on demand. > > - Jed > >
