The Proton Radius Problem and the Muon.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/08/researchers-orbit-a-muon-around-an-atom-confirm-physics-is-broken/ Very interesting article on Ars Technica with possible far-reaching implications for LENR researchers. These discrepancies from standard model predictions in nuclei charge radii when muons orbit them fit in nicely with both the unexpected muon anomalous magnetic moment and my theory of LENR involving electron based spin waves as a source for the fifth force of nature. The "muon anomalous magnetic moment" is caused by increased magnetic drag from the increased magnetic influence of virtual particle creation around the rotating muon. Virtual particle induced magnetism produces a marked increase in precession in the muons magnetic moment more than the standard model predicts. The Standard model based particle zoo that the standard model would expect to be instantiated by vacuum particle creation defines the magnetic effects of the vacuum on the magnetic moment of the muon. That is, there are more types of particles popping in and out of the vacuum than the Standard model has discovered so far. Researchers have just discovered a possible new force carrying particle(boson) whose creation as a virtual particle in the vacuum would explain why the muon is precessing so much more than the Standard Model predicts. The increase in the magnetic moment of the muon over what the standard model expects would explain the reduced charge radius of the nuclei that the muon orbits. If this new magnetically charged boson causes increase precession in the magnetic moment of the muon then symmetry would predict that electron precession would generate this new boson and/or increase it power level. There is much RF coming from LENR reactors so LENR is marked by lots of electron precession which would produce lots of this new fifth force carrying bosons. The coupling constant of this new fifth force might cause the other forces to converge to unification (the GUT theory of LENR) more readily than the Standard Model now predicts and this increased force screening of the strong and weak forces would produce all the effects that we now see in LENR. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > A force carrier that is do light should have a very long range, This I do > not understand. I can;t help that this protophobic gauge boson is really a > coherent quasiparticle of a collection or bundle of photons or the like > that has a short lifetime. > > Why can it explain the muon anomalous magnetic moment? Is it magnetic > nature? anyone??? > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In answer to an offline question about testing or falsifying this 5th >> force hypothesis without the expense of heavy isotopes of palladium – one >> option >> comes to mind just now. >> >> Remember the “bubble fusion” experiment of Rusi Taleyarkhan? He was >> vindicated in his use of the very heavy element Californium as an >> accelerant for fusion (it’s been a long time but his name is still in my >> spell-checker, along with bremsstrahlung J >> >> Well – the heavier and more neutron rich the element used, the more >> likely it would be to have a surplus of neuglu bosons – at least as I >> understand it. Californium would not decay fast enough to help on its own >> in terms of anomalous energy – but it could supply a steady source of >> neuglu to fuse deuterons in other ways - which would then provide the >> thermal gain in many types of experiments including electrolysis and >> Arata-type. >> >> In fact, Rusi used an amount so tiny it should not have mattered, expect >> to his jealous peers. Yet the Cf was beneficial – and the reason could and >> probably did relate to neuglu. Cf is not cheap or available however. >> >> As Bob Cook implied from a recent IE article – there could be some of >> the same magic with U, a bit lighter … but if cost is important - by >> far the most economical thing to do for a potential neuglu source is to >> cannibalize a few smoke detectors for the Americium. There are vids on >> YouTube to show you how to remove handle the stuff. >> >> But even in micrograms, this is risky business and I am not advocating >> it. >> > >
