The court will decide who is right, not you.
AA
On 8/26/2016 11:58 AM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote:
/It doesn't look like IH had a single technical person so why do you
think they could have contributed anything to the plant design or
operation? They ultimately hired Murray, but lacking tech expertise
they hired someone with the wrong experience. Likewise, it seems that
they were unable to understand if the plant was working and if it
wasn't, do something about it.
AA/
/
/
It doesn't matter if IH had not technical expertise. In fact, the
fiduciary duty of Rossi should be even higher because of that.
Besides Rossi's audience is the world, not just IH.
If Rossi was not the scam that he is, he should try to convince the
entire world, let alone other potential investors besides IH, that his
technology is real.
Doing misleading things (as noted in a interconnected web of lies),
not involving his partners and investors, avoiding answering questions
in a direct way, coming up with excuses after excuses and never
delivering the goods should discredit Rossi for good but his ardent
followers never give up no matter what idiocy Rossi does and says.
By the way no matter the field of expertise Murray's questions in
Exibit 5 are relevant and to the point. They are questions we all ask
and Penon or Rossi never answered.
Fabiani never sent the raw data even when requested to do so several
times (even renouncing to be paid for his services in exchange of the
raw data).
Is not all this makes you suspicious (it makes me disgusted), even a
little bit?
Giovanni
/
/
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Jed: "Whether or not this happened, there's a more general point
that should be apparent to anyone who has had a chance to read all
of the documents filed so far. Leonardo made zero effort to
involve IH in the planning and execution of the alleged GPT, and
at no point was there an effort to persuade them of its validity. "
It doesn't look like IH had a single technical person so why do
you think they could have contributed anything to the plant design
or operation? They ultimately hired Murray, but lacking tech
expertise they hired someone with the wrong experience. Likewise,
it seems that they were unable to understand if the plant was
working and if it wasn't, do something about it.
AA
On 8/26/2016 9:40 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Alain Sepeda
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Being a bit naive I would say it is not smart to clean
evidences when you want to convince someone it works, and it
is indeed working.
Whether or not this happened, there's a more general point that
should be apparent to anyone who has had a chance to read all of
the documents filed so far. Leonardo made zero effort to involve
IH in the planning and execution of the alleged GPT, and at no
point was there an effort to persuade them of its validity. We
are even given to understand that IH had objected to the Doral
business being construed as the GPT. This should put anyone on
notice that the territory we're in here is not normal territory
but instead Alice in Wonderland territory. If Leonardo believed
that there was a real GPT underway (not a sure thing as far as I
can tell), they will have been proceeding under the understanding
that it was a purely formal thing, to check off some check
boxes. All of this is independent of the actual manner in which
the alleged GPT was carried out -- whether a shoddy job was done,
or whether it was a bona fide test demonstrating ~ 1MW power for
a year -- which one gathers is a topic of earnest debate on E-Cat
World.
More likely it seems to me is that even Rossi was not of the
understanding that the whole business in Florida was legitimately
the GPT. Instead I wonder whether the Doral activity was being
conducted for reasons that were not transparent from the
lawsuit. One thought is that Rossi was putting pressure on IH to
back out of the license agreement on favorable terms, so that he
could enter into a new business arrangement unencumbered with a
more tractable business partner. IH were unwilling to do so, and
so Rossi sought various ways of raising the stakes, first acting
erratically and then going through the motions of the GPT.
Perhaps he was of the assumption that IH would want to avoid bad
publicity enough not to allow the matter to go to trial. If so,
this seems like a miscalculation on his part or a desperate endgame.
IH may have had reasons either to continue with the license
agreement, or at least not cancel it without being reimbursed for
various expenses incurred in Florida beyond the 11.5 million they
had already paid. The terms for canceling the license agreement
may have been too objectionable to Rossi without significant
modification.
Eric
