One improbable hypothesis is that the strange behavior, like reported by IH about the way the Swedish licensee was deterred, is that once again Rossi succeeded in convincing his partner to flee, so he can marry with a new bride...
I don't believe it, but we cannot be sure. moreover consider that some strange tests show behaviors that are difficult to interpret as total failures. one characteristic of Rossi, we tolerated and justified too long, is to maintain permanent uncertainty. 2016-08-30 0:00 GMT+02:00 a.ashfield <[email protected]>: > But countless times you have said Rossi is a fraud and the COP<1 > Now you're saying the E-Cat maybe worked? > If the E-Cat worked earlier do you really suppose Rossi retrograded > performance with time? > AA > > > > On 8/29/2016 5:09 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> It seems the American Physical Society is going to publish replication >> results of Rossi's Ni/H2/L reactor >> How are you going to explain that Jed? >> > > Any member can publish anything at an APS conference. (They set that rule > many years ago, after a rather gruesome incident.) > > This result, if true, might indicate Ni-H cold fusion works, but that has > no bearing on the fact that Rossi's 1 year test could not possibly have > produced 1 MW. > > Rossi's earlier results might be real. I cannot rule that out, as I have > said before. However, there is not the slightest chance this result is real > because as I said the heat would kill everyone in the room. Also, the flow > meter and pressure readings appear to be fake. The flow meter numbers are > too regular to be true, and the pressure is impossible. > > - Jed > > >
