Alain,
Your point is obscure. The bottom line is that Rossi has no real
protection from competition except to sell the reactors are a very
competitive cost. So he cant give details, nor is it to his advantage to
prove it works scientifically.
It has not been a long time to reach market when you consider the
novelty, instability of the process and the lack of understanding how it
works. If Rossi manages to get a commercial reactor to market in under
six months, as he says he hopes to do, no one will complain.
AA
On 8/30/2016 2:33 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
One improbable hypothesis is that the strange behavior,
like reported by IH about the way the Swedish licensee was deterred,
is that once again Rossi succeeded in convincing his partner to flee,
so he can marry with a new bride...
I don't believe it, but we cannot be sure.
moreover consider that some strange tests show behaviors that are
difficult to interpret as total failures.
one characteristic of Rossi, we tolerated and justified too long, is
to maintain permanent uncertainty.
2016-08-30 0:00 GMT+02:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>:
But countless times you have said Rossi is a fraud and the COP<1
Now you're saying the E-Cat maybe worked?
If the E-Cat worked earlier do you really suppose Rossi
retrograded performance with time?
AA
On 8/29/2016 5:09 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
It seems the American Physical Society is going to publish
replication results of Rossi's Ni/H2/L reactor
How are you going to explain that Jed?
Any member can publish anything at an APS conference. (They set
that rule many years ago, after a rather gruesome incident.)
This result, if true, might indicate Ni-H cold fusion works, but
that has no bearing on the fact that Rossi's 1 year test could
not possibly have produced 1 MW.
Rossi's earlier results might be real. I cannot rule that out, as
I have said before. However, there is not the slightest chance
this result is real because as I said the heat would kill
everyone in the room. Also, the flow meter and pressure readings
appear to be fake. The flow meter numbers are too regular to be
true, and the pressure is impossible.
- Jed
