I don’t trust Rossi as an objective tester of E-Cat safety. It is not in Rossi’s commercial interest as a developer of the LENR paradigm to track down the very hard to detect glitches in the characterization of LENR safety. People who work on LENR projects should be open and forthcoming with regards to any possible ill effects that their work might be causing them even if that information works to their disadvantage in the energy marketplace.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Many LENR enthusiasts look forward to the day when they can heat their > homes and power their electric appliances from a small LENR power reactor > located in their basement. > > Rossi dreams of a 100 watt LENR light bulb that can replace the electric > lighting that we use today. > > But safe use of LENR as a power source might preclude these dreams of "off > the grid' existence from coming true. A more protected mode of LENR reactor > deployment might be in order. Just the current observation that LENR can > produce widespread and far reaching electrical interference might be reason > for cause for concern. > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Actually the cold fusion ‘spooky action at a distance’ effect is only >> apparently producing such spooky psycho effects on cold fusion denialists >> and pundits, the vast majority of the cold fusion experimentalists seem to >> be quite sane and fine. So if you fancy yourself a cold fusion/lenr pundit >> either pro or con your admonition is especially important that you watch >> out for that voodoo that you do ;) >> >> >> >> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Friday, September 16, 2016 11:46 PM >> *To:* vortex-l >> *Subject:* [Vo]:Abnormal neurological symptoms related to your LENR >> experiments. >> >> >> >> There have been at least three LENR developers who have noticed intense >> and widespread EMF interference generated from their experiments that in >> some cases have spanned a distance of influence of many tens of meters from >> the LENR reactor. All these LENR experimenters as well as myself all took >> this interference to be related to RF generation in the LENR reaction. But >> this assumption about RF might not be correct but instead be related to >> some form of sub-atomic particle generation via the LENR reaction. >> >> >> >> This interference could have a disruptive effect on the body, especially, >> the electrical nature and workings of the brain and nervous system. This >> EMF interference has been near impossible to detect using RF meters or to >> shield against including the use of lead, iron, steel plate, electrically >> charged metal, mu metal and faraday screening. If the nature of this EMF >> interference can penetrate deeply and completely into the body and access >> all the electrical activity in the nerves cells throughout the body, >> unpredictable complications might be produced inside the body at a >> considerable distance from the LENR reactor and/or inactive stored used >> fuel. >> >> >> >> Different people might be more susceptible to this type of nerve activity >> interference than others based on the strength of the interference produced >> by any given reactor design. If you are a LENR experimenter, keep a lookout >> for abnormal neurological symptoms related to your LENR experiments. >> > >
