How about deflecting muon paths by strong magnetic fields. I found this info <https://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=muon_bending.data> .
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Unsolicited observations of identical experimental consequences lends > credence to the production of a common causative reaction. For > example, Defkalion saw not advantage in reporting a major problem that > they suffered in the testing and demonstration of their system that > later ture up in other systems. ME356 explained why his testing > instruments and sensors were malfunctioning 3 meters away from his > reaction. This is very similar to what Defkalion had reported. > > Now Holmlid tells why such observations are a result of muon > production. Now, the picture becomes a little clearer, a common thread > can be drawn to the point that if ionization production is not > observed in a LENR experimental situation, then the power production > of the reaction and even its existence is rightly questioned. > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Brian Ahern <[email protected]> wrote: > > Toomuch credit is being given to Me356 andDefkalion. For that matter, > Mills > > also has a troublesome history. His latest announcement seems curiously > like > > a 'Me too' response to . > > > > the E > > > > The discussion seems to accept the fraudulent claims and empowers them. > If > > this was a legalaction we would refer to the 'alledged energy > production'. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 1:15 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Axil Axil .... If LENR is heavily deployed in a high density urban > > housing situation, then a dense field of general muon interference will > > produce a impossible to shield zone of electronic and electrical failure. > > -------- > > > > There is a well-known way to mollify this problem affordably, and provide > > extra energy at the same time. Lead itself is way too expensive. > > > > The idea is to capture muons in a thick jacket around the reactor. Very > > thick. The only way to do this cheaply is specialty concrete. > > > > 10 feet thickness of specialty concrete which is made with the addition > of > > iron ore and lead ore to Portland cement will convert 90% of muons into > low > > grade heat. Copper tubing can remove the heat. Not fancy, but ideal for > > places like northern China and Russia which can use lots of low grade > heat. > > A dollar of lead ore is superior to $100 of lead metal. > > > > > > > >
