Hi Jed,
Like I said, no proof of anything remains.. thats Texan for.. I dunno.
Granted we have A&M where agriculture and cattle are equal to engineering
and a BS degree is however you choose to interpret it, but it's hard to sell
us sawdust for soap more than twice. One tower imploding.. ok , I'll buy
that, two towers become a stretch, but when three implode symetrically.. Hey
! come on, that soap is beginning to feel like sawdust.
Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jed Rothwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: S. Jones makes claims about 9/11 attack
RC Macaulay writes:
With all debris removed from the WT site, no proof of anything remains.
That's incorrect. Thousands of tons were put aside for the investigation,
and have been preserved. Samples of the damaged steel and other materials
have been extensively tested by many independent labs. If there had
anything like what Jones suggested, hundreds of experts would have spotted
it easily, and it would have been impossible to keep secret.
Jones also denounced cold fusion in this newspaper article. This is the
first time I have seen an attack on cold fusion and breathed a sigh of
relief. I would not want the field to be associated with -- or endorsed
by -- nutcakes who think the Towers were destroyed with explosives.
- Jed
