Years ago, Russ George told me that in one of his experiments he could "see
helium bubbles." At the time I said that is impossible because if you could
see the bubbles the reactor would be producing more power than any
laboratory experiment. However, yesterday I ran the numbers and found I may
be wrong about that. I have estimated that if the cell was producing ~1 kW,
perhaps he could see bubbles. This is not to say Russ was right. I do not
know how much anomalous power he measured. There could be bubbles from some
other source. I do not know whether he collected the gas and analyzed it.
But anyway, here is my estimate. I would appreciate it if readers here
would check the numbers.

Assumptions:

This is D + D fusion producing Helium-4.

The smallest bubbles you could see are fine ones. I suppose the total
volume of gas is approximately 1 cubic millimeter per minute. Anything
smaller would probably not be visible to the naked eye.

The gas in the bubbles is at STP. Probably not, but anyway, close to it.

D+D fusion produces 245,000 MJ per gram of deuterium. I double checked that
number with some web sites:

http://www.geo.cornell.edu/eas/energy/research_front_page/nuclear_fusion.html
http://electron6.phys.utk.edu/phys250/modules/module%205/nuclear_energy.htm
(U. Tennessee, value given in ergs per gram)
http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2012/01/nuclear-fusion/

Also from U. Tennessee: Efficiency (E/mc2)  Chemical energy 3 x 10E-8%,
Fission 0.002%, Fusion 0.4%. In other words, the mass of helium is almost
the same as the starting mass of deuterium. I will ignore the lost mass.


Okay --

The volume of any gas at STP is 22.4 L per mole. One mole of helium weighs
4 g. So it weighs 0.1786 g/L.

1 mm^3 is 1/1,000,000 of a liter. 1 mm^3 per minute is 0.000000016667 L/s.
So the helium weighs 0.000000002976 g.

Multiply that weight by 345,000 MJ gives 0.001026785714 MJ/s. That's 1,025
J/s (watts).

That's a lot less power than I thought!


Cross-check. Mel Miles says fusion produces helium at a rate of 10E11 to
10E12 atoms per second per watt. Divide Avagadro's number by 10E11 gives
1.66E-12 moles, or 6.64E-12 g helum, which multiplied by 345,000 MJ/g gives
2.3 W. Close enough!

Mel Miles measured at most ~400 mW of anomalous power as I recall. That
produces very little helium, as you see from these numbers. 0.400 J /
3.45E11 J = 1.16E-12 g/s (0.0012 nanograms). Right? He collected for 4,400
s, but still that's not many nanograms.


Interesting extrapolation. According to the International Energy Agency
(iea) "Key world energy statistics" the world primary energy supply in 2015
was 5,269 Mtoe. An Mtoe is "millions of tons oil equivalent." The
conversion factor is 41,868,000,000 MJ per Mtoe. So that's 2.21E14 MJ. It
would take 639 tons of deuterium to produce that with cold fusion. As I
said, I am ignoring lost mass, so that would produce ~639 tons of helium.

https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/key-world-energy-statistics.html

In my book I estimated that you would end up with 1,227 tons of helium,
about twice as much. I do not know where the discrepancy came in. Perhaps I
calculated it wrong, or perhaps I was looking at the heat required to
produce the primary energy, with the assumption that all energy will come
from cold fusion powered heat engines. That issue is complicated because
not all of our energy today comes from heat engines. In the U.S. 15% comes
from hydroelectricity, wind and solar power, and 20% comes from nuclear
power. They do not usually include the raw heat from nuclear power in
estimates of primary energy.

The mass to energy conversion for 5,269 Mtoe is the same for any source of
energy, mechanical, chemical, fission or fusion. When you wind up a spring
driven clock it gains mass. As it runs down it loses mass. Some people have
the notion that only nuclear energy annihilates mass. That is incorrect.

Here is another extrapolation. A modern jet aircraft burns about 1 gallon
of kerosene per second. That produces 142 MW of heat which converts to ~90
MW of mechanical thrust with 63% efficiency. I think. So, assuming a cold
fusion engine is also 63% efficient, 4 g of deuterium would be consumed in
about 162 minutes (2.7 hours).

- Jed

Reply via email to