Why not respond like your fantasy of a scientist? Why, because you are an armchair self-serving critic who never does anything but try to raise your own worth by trolling worthless comments at the expense of people who do real work and have original ideas. The fact that you won’t spend 5 minutes finding the answers to your own questions but constantly posture as if those you make reasonable demands under the threat and demonstration over years of your pressing and persistent insults is ample proof that your interest is disingenuous. Saying I sound like Mitch Swartz is the highest compliment I can imagine.
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 6:59 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:How much helium? Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: Yes, of course why would anyone not do so. The methods used were all of the usual state of the art methods, just do your reading into the complexities of measuring helium in metals and you’ll see how it is done. It’s all at your Googling fingertips. You sound like Mitchell Swartz. You went to a lot of trouble to write this non-answer. Why not respond like a scientist instead? Tell us what method you used, what results you obtained, and where you published. The same goes for your claims about muons. Instead of describing a mystical gut-level feeling, tell us what kind of muon detector you used and what the results were. - Jed
