Axil, according to a 2005 paper by Jan Naudts the hydrino may be relativistic hydrogen, but considering the environment this is not your near C velocity induced SR, in fact the near C observer relative to us is the perspective that we now observe wrt the hydrino, the same suppression responsible for Casimir effect modifies the inertial frames in nano powders and skeletal catalysts such that hydrogen atoms loading into the bulk product is constantly changing inertial frames as it randomly migrates thru the lattice and defects. I remain convinced the “suppressed” longer vacuum wavelengths between Casimir plates are actually still present and that we are actually observing the same contraction and dilation phenomena the near C observer would see viewing us.. the baseline we call stationary for inertial frames is established by the remaining “rate” of the particles winking in and out of our plane. I put “rate” in quotes because we know from SR the local observer is never aware of a rate change since this rate establishes his clock. My point being the “baseline” is IMHO false, I think Casimir effect and all the London derived forces are based on reducing this baseline further thru suppression and that it accumulates far faster than the square law we are accustomed to and without the need for thust.. it is the poor mans nano route to relativistic effects utilizing geometry. Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 3:56 AM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Is hydrinos dark matter? The hydrino cannot be smaller than the neutron. Being neutral, it must behave like the neutron. We should see hydrino damage on the structure of the SunCell and maybe even activation as hydrino kinetic energy is converted to gamma by impact with reactor structure. We might also expect to see nuclear reactions produced by hydrinos and associated transmutation as the hydrino enters nuclei. Dark matter does not do that sort of thing. What keeps hydrinos from acting like neutrons?
