Forget the tresino, grok the quatrino...
Although Mayer's tresino gets the most attention in the cited paper, and
is very close to Mills "hydrino hydride" it is a charged particle.
Therefore, it should be very noticeable and since it is not seen, it
probably does not exist in useful quantities. To match the experiments
we need a neutral particle and the "quatrino" is more likely to be
involved in LENR.
If it exists, the quatrino is a neutral composite of two protons and two
electrons which do not orbit in the normal way, thus it is far more
compact than the H2 molecule, and with a mass of only 1.8 GeV...
depleted of energy and inert. It is very stable and dark, as we might
expect. Either Compton composite are described by Mayer to be stable and
long-lived, and thus dark matter candidates.
"The quatrino is a four-body composite with two hydrogen nuclei located
on the axis at z and two electrons on a circle of radius r in the
midplane. The orbital velocity of the electrons is very small, and there
is zero angular momentum... the binding energy of the quatrino is about
25 keV." The high binding energy probably means it avoids detection in a
mass spectrometer. However, it should be detectable if one made a
concerted effort using the details provided.
Being so energy depleted, however, it cannot easily react in a nuclear
reaction but guess what ... this fact could mean that it is more easily
annihilated in a laser pulse! Thus the quatrino could fit well into
Holmlid's experiments as a theoretical replacement for UDH, which has
always seemed to be more of a kludge than a real entity. I like Mayers
concept, math and logic. Holmlid should have a look.
