Roibin— I agree that dimensionless constants are ok. I stand corrected.
Bob cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: H LV Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 7:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tresino, EZBW, Barut, h and bound state of spinning magnets On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 8:48 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: In reply to <[email protected]>'s message of Sat, 11 Feb 2017 09:14:56 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Constants in theories only reflect limited understanding of the natural laws >IMHO. To get at the truth, we need to eliminate constants from our logic and >resulting truths. (Constants are ok for engineers that try to develop some >practical device.) > [snip] You need at least some constants to describe relative sizes. I.e. dimensionless constants. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html There might also be an underlying relationship between the constants of nature and the constants of mathematics. wikipedia page on various mathematical constants https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_constant Harry
