>>If we understand the mechanism of the repulsion between particles...
again with things that are consequences of Boscovich's theory published 1758.
The doctrine of atomism led to Boscovich's point-particles, where since there
was no contact between particles everything had to be explained by fields of
attractive and repulsive forces. Basis of modern atomic physics and unified
field theory.
talks on unified field theory at: http://unifiedfieldtheory.co.uk/
On Thursday, 9 March 2017, 10:50, H Ucar <[email protected]> wrote:
If we understand the mechanism of the repulsion between particles may we can
find smarter way to overcome. About two years ago I observed a rotating magnet,
dipole revolving on the rotation plane repels another dipole magnet regardless
its orientation. Despite being a simple phenomenon, it doesn't take place in
textbooks, even in the literature, at least in a way that I can understand.
Bound states that I obtained between magnets are based on this effect. On the
other hand the mechanical version of the stability case (is known as Inverted
Pendulum and is based to Mathieu/Hill's equation. In 1974, van der Heide
discovered a magnetic counterpart of the inverted pendulum "Stabilization by
oscillation", Philips tech. Rev. 34, 61-72, 1974, No. 2/3, although the
demonstation involves quadrupolar magnet and can not be interpreted as bound
state (article do not mentions too). Here is the video of the experiment
https://youtu.be/ZofshixkMg4 , which I first observed the non-polar repulsion
and gave the sign of possibility of levtation / bound state.
As the bound state obtained this way is mainly kinetic (rather than static),
there are many way to disturb it, resulting in breaking it apart or collapse.
Interestingly, kinetic energy of the system can be higher than the total
kinetic energy of the unbounded components, a case expressed as positive
binding energy. This condition arose when a resonance build up in some parts,
and mostly destroy the stability but they are cases the bound state kept alive.
In, now the abandoned idea of neutron as composite of p and e, its mass exceeds
the total of p and e, suggests positive binding energy. May the
instability/beta decay can be explained this way. Barut had theoreticized
nuclear forces by magnetic/electromagnetic interactions, bound state of
permanent magnets may fit in this if presence of rotational/oscillatory
magnetic fields can be proved within nucleons.
Looking to elastic p - e- and p - e+ scatterings, they are similar (by a brief
examination), which can be expected if the interaction is in magnetic nature.
From point of view of my scattering experiment, polarization of protons may
have importance rather than electron (positron) polarization. It would be
interesting to observe the difference of unpolarized and polarized electrons in
different energies of the electron beam on scattering experiments. Enough
speculations for now.
