"classical physics" covers a lot of things classical physics Physics that does not make use of quantum mechanics or the theory of relativity. Newtonian mechanics, thermodynamics, and Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism are all examples of classical physics. Many theories in classical physics break down when applied to extremely small objects such as atoms or to objects moving near the speed of light. the definition of classical physics | | | | | |
| | | | | the definition of classical physics Classical physics definition at Dictionary.com, a free online dictionary with pronunciation, synonyms and transl... | | | | Boscovich atomic theory In his atomic theory, Boscovich blended Newton’s 1718 atomic theory, i.e. viewing the world as being composed a elementary particles that attract at close distances via the force of chemical affinity, and Gottfried Leibniz’s view of atomic particles as ‘points of energy’, to conceive a newer theory of ‘point atoms’ or ‘stationary atom theory’ in which atoms were regarded as centers of forces without spatial extent, and whereas Newton focused on attraction, Boscovich added to this the importance of repulsive forces, such that at short range, atoms attracted each other, but that at longer range, atoms pushed each other way, the latter aspect explaining gas pressure. [1] In this model, the rigid surface of the Democritus atom model was replaced by a region of equilibrium between the forces of attraction and repulsion associated with the dynamic field surrounding the atom collapsed into a material point. [4]http://www.eoht.info/page/Roger+Boscovich On Thursday, 9 March 2017, 16:15, H Ucar <[email protected]> wrote: Demonstrated non-polar repulsion can be perfectly explained by classical physics. I don't see any arguments here to involve explicitely Boscovich's theory. BTW, a nice article dated 1957, "Boscovich and Particle Theory" written by L. L. WHYTE can be read from http://www.nature.com.sci-hub.bz/nature/journal/v179/n4554/abs/179284a0.html On Mar 9, 2017 16:33, "ROGER ANDERTON" <[email protected]> wrote: >>If we understand the mechanism of the repulsion between particles... again with things that are consequences of Boscovich's theory published 1758. The doctrine of atomism led to Boscovich's point-particles, where since there was no contact between particles everything had to be explained by fields of attractive and repulsive forces. Basis of modern atomic physics and unified field theory. talks on unified field theory at: http://unifiedfieldtheory.co. uk/ On Thursday, 9 March 2017, 10:50, H Ucar <[email protected]> wrote: If we understand the mechanism of the repulsion between particles may we can find smarter way to overcome. About two years ago I observed a rotating magnet, dipole revolving on the rotation plane repels another dipole magnet regardless its orientation. Despite being a simple phenomenon, it doesn't take place in textbooks, even in the literature, at least in a way that I can understand. Bound states that I obtained between magnets are based on this effect. On the other hand the mechanical version of the stability case (is known as Inverted Pendulum and is based to Mathieu/Hill's equation. In 1974, van der Heide discovered a magnetic counterpart of the inverted pendulum "Stabilization by oscillation", Philips tech. Rev. 34, 61-72, 1974, No. 2/3, although the demonstation involves quadrupolar magnet and can not be interpreted as bound state (article do not mentions too). Here is the video of the experiment https://youtu.be/ZofshixkMg4 , which I first observed the non-polar repulsion and gave the sign of possibility of levtation / bound state. As the bound state obtained this way is mainly kinetic (rather than static), there are many way to disturb it, resulting in breaking it apart or collapse. Interestingly, kinetic energy of the system can be higher than the total kinetic energy of the unbounded components, a case expressed as positive binding energy. This condition arose when a resonance build up in some parts, and mostly destroy the stability but they are cases the bound state kept alive. In, now the abandoned idea of neutron as composite of p and e, its mass exceeds the total of p and e, suggests positive binding energy. May the instability/beta decay can be explained this way. Barut had theoreticized nuclear forces by magnetic/electromagnetic interactions, bound state of permanent magnets may fit in this if presence of rotational/oscillatory magnetic fields can be proved within nucleons. Looking to elastic p - e- and p - e+ scatterings, they are similar (by a brief examination), which can be expected if the interaction is in magnetic nature. From point of view of my scattering experiment, polarization of protons may have importance rather than electron (positron) polarization. It would be interesting to observe the difference of unpolarized and polarized electrons in different energies of the electron beam on scattering experiments. Enough speculations for now.
