Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote:

I submit that using neural techniques to solve a problem is not AI.
>

Well, your brain is neural network of a similar nature. It is not just an
analogy; the brain really is a neural network. Clearly, this architecture
can give rise to intelligence. Whether it will in this case remains to be
seen.



> If it were AI, the machine would be able to understand what had been said,
> ascribe context to it, and be able to integrate it into its database for
> application in a completely different domain.
>

They are getting closer to doing that every day. Whether they will ever
rival humans remains to be seen. I expect they will be better than us some
things and were set others. They are already better at pattern recognition,
for example.



> Not only would it have translated what it read, but it would have learned
> something about the psychology of what had been said - not just how to
> better convey it in a different language.
>

I see no reason why this will not happen sooner or later. Machines are far
from being able to do this now, because they have brains roughly the size
of a bird's brain. Birds do not understand human language. However they are
capable of doing remarkable things. Their ability to navigate
three-dimensional space is astounding. As I pointed out in my book, if a
chicken gets into your kitchen and you chase after it, you will see that it
is better at evasion than you are at catching a chicken. (I know about this
because we used to keep chickens.)



> We are really far away from this type of AI concept learning, concept
> incorporation into it own intelligence . . .
>

I am not sure what that means. Do you mean interfacing peoples brains to
computers? Or do you mean making machine intelligence similar to our
brains. I see no reason to make AI resemble human intelligence. This is
like making airplanes that flap their wings, imitating birds.



> , and application of the concepts to problem solving in a completely
> different domain.  This still requires invention.
>

Of course. However, neural networks can probably provide the basis for this.

- Jed

Reply via email to