Is it well known based on real data that the charge of the electron remains constant at short distances from another charge-- positive or negative?
An interesting recent paper addresses this question. “ Understanding the discrete nature of angular momentum of electron in hydrogen atom with (3G,2e) model of final unification” at: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=962 High energy electron scattering experiments may provide data to address this question of charge changing at short distances. I am not sure what special relativity would indicate about high energy electron’s apparent charge, however. Bob Cook From: Bob Higgins Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 9:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together? There is also the possibility of one or more of the S orbital electrons of the larger parent atom being taken into a sub-ground hydrino state. In which case, each of the electrons in such a state would screen a proton and make those protons appear like neutrons. For example, say one of the S orbital electrons of 55Co went into a sub-ground state orbital screening one if the proton charges. The atom would appear chemically to have one less proton and one more neutron - becoming 55Fe. From a nuclear stability standpoint, though it would still appear as 55Co presumably (but this is also unstable in this case). A pico-hydride implies that the hydrino hydrogen would be able to form a shared chemical (electron) bond with the low abundance stable 54Fe. I just can't imagine a hydrino being able to share an electronic state with another atom because the hydrino's electron is so tightly bound to the hydrino nucleus - not an ordinary valence bond for sure. In a high resolution mass spectrometer, the 54Fe+picohydride would weigh more than a 55Fe and that should be observable. They have such a spectrometer at Purdue. On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: Bob Higgins wrote: The predicted properties of the hydrino or any sub-ground-state hydrogen suggest that it will be really hard to detect... It must be detected by proxy. Like detecting the neutrino, detection of the hydrino will require new, inventive techniques Bob, I generally agree that new thinking is needed. This is why I brought up Dufour's ICCF20 talk and the iron-55 evidence, the so-called pico-hydride. It is a very elegant and simple way to confirm dense hydrogen. The dense hydrogen becomes attached (magnetically?) to iron 54 in such a way that on mass-spec analysis, it looks like 55Fe - but is NOT radioactive. Normal 55Fe is strongly radioactive. This looks like a brilliant solution to detection ! and could be the smoking gun for dense hydrogen , but it does not conform to Mills theory so he will never agree.
