Eric,
I don't feel expert enough to pass judgement. I think that is the
point. Physicists more expert than me can't make up their minds whether
Mills is a genius or delusional. That he can come up with values for
particles that are more accurate than from QM and that his program can
show the position nuclei and electrons for complicated molecules
(proven) suggests to me that it is premature to be so dogmatic that he
is wrong. Likewise there is good evidence that the SunCell produces a
large amount of excess heat, though one might quibble about the actual
value.
AA
On 3/25/2017 5:52 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 4:49 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
To me it looks like the hand waving is largely from the skeptics.
I have yet to see a specific item that is wrong in Mills theories
highlighted by them.
Did you take a look at the link I sent? Can you help us to make sense
of those equations? What would be ideal would be an explicit
derivation of the electron-neutron mass ratio, which is purportedly
based on those equations. If you can do this, it would be a very
helpful thing. My strong hunch: it is not possible, because the
Mills neutron-electron mass ratio is ad hoc and was not derived from
them. But your knowledge here can help to dispel this impression.
Eric
