as I point out in my talk : the Copernican revolution led to an existential
crisis and the full implications of the unified field theory published 1758
most people found themselves unable to cope with:
Introduction to Boscovich talk by Stoiljkovich + existential crisis in physics
R Anderton ANPA 2016
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Introduction to Boscovich talk by Stoiljkovich + existential crisis in phys...
Copernician Revolution led to Existential crisis, the fall-out of which we
still suffer. Boscovich's theory ... | |
|
|
latest books on unified field theory presented at UCL last month:
Book Launch for books on Unified Field Theory Nicholas Maxwell March 2017
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Book Launch for books on Unified Field Theory Nicholas Maxwell March 2017
Book Launch for the books: In Praise of Natural Philosophy: A revolution for
Thought and Life , and Understandin... | |
|
|
On Sunday, 2 April 2017, 16:12, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
#yiv0759508617 #yiv0759508617 -- _filtered #yiv0759508617 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5
4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv0759508617 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2
4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv0759508617 {font-family:Georgia;panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5
2 3 3;}#yiv0759508617 #yiv0759508617 p.yiv0759508617MsoNormal, #yiv0759508617
li.yiv0759508617MsoNormal, #yiv0759508617 div.yiv0759508617MsoNormal
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;}#yiv0759508617 a:link,
#yiv0759508617 span.yiv0759508617MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0759508617 a:visited, #yiv0759508617
span.yiv0759508617MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0759508617
span.yiv0759508617m533984284366783107st {}#yiv0759508617
span.yiv0759508617hoenzb {}#yiv0759508617
span.yiv0759508617m533984284366783107gmail-m5486777921319670336m2431543213860854541hoenzb
{}#yiv0759508617
span.yiv0759508617m533984284366783107gmail-m5486777921319670336m2431543213860854541m5833325939559596372m6302757992862348797hoenzb
{}#yiv0759508617
span.yiv0759508617m533984284366783107gmail-m5486777921319670336m2431543213860854541m5833325939559596372hoenzb
{}#yiv0759508617 .yiv0759508617MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv0759508617
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv0759508617 div.yiv0759508617WordSection1
{}#yiv0759508617 Axil— I agree with your notion of current science. IMHO
what’s happening (slowly) to physics and chemistry and the other sciences is a
gradual change in the scientific community to accepting facts instead of hiding
their head in dogma and more myths because of the lack good solid facts, often
hid by institutional (political) control of the scientific community. This is
what has by happened starting in the 1930’s to institutions of “higher
learning” under the thumb of government control via financing but seems to be
back on the right track with the event of the internet and better communication
among individuals. The same thing happened to the community of “scholars”
in the reformation of Christian dogma. Darwin and new geologists following
various Italians like Galileo and his predecessors forced facts on the large
community of “scholars”—the priests—and the lay people who tended to have a
better sense of reason. The complex dogma—non-reason—lost favor by the common
people because of the event of mass education in the liberal arts starting with
the invention of the printing press. The internet is proving to provide a
similar improvement in communication among the masses with access to unbiased
ideas in many instances. Of course there is the danger of institutional
control of free exchange of ideas and data—facts—in order to maintain the
status quo with a financial advantage for some. An education policy of
conservative arts does not foster change, which LENR will cause IMHO. Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 6:21 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics. LENR will redefine a goodly amount
of our current science. Unfortunately because of this new paradigm in science,
LENR is very esoteric. To support my assertion, this following reference
shows that the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) quasiparticle produces a
monopole magnetic field. Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave
like magnetic monopoles http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 9:01 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
Axil,
So you say, and I don't mean that disparagingly. I don't know and don't have
the time to investigate those esoteric theories well enough to understand if
they are right. As far as I know, no one has ever demonstrated a magnetic
monopole but some talk about them as real. The proof is less convincing to me
than that Rossi 's E-Cat works. In both cases I'd rather wait and see.
AA On 4/1/2017 7:30 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
There is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a monopole
quasiparticle like the SPP, and a magnetic field formatted to support monopole
flux lines. The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic
field (almost a monopole formated magnetic field). This SmCo5 type magnetic
supports monopole flux lines of force. That is why the SmCo5 magnet can
produce a LENR reaction. To refresh your memory, see
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg108069.html On Sat, Apr
1, 2017 at 6:36 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
Axil,
I am not able to judge the properties of many of these smaller particles. They
seem to be more a matter of the individual's belief than pinned down by
experiment. Let me know when someone proves the existence of a magnetic
monopole.
AA On 4/1/2017 3:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi et al are confusing cause and effect. The strong and the weak force
produce nuclear change and the subatomic particles are the effects of how those
forces function. The strong and the weak force produce the pion, muons, and
mesons that Rossi is now factoring into his theory. But these particles are
just the effects of what the strong force is doing in LENR. LENR is a condition
where the strong force changes the way it behaves. The particles are the
results of this change in behavior. Professional science states the the
fundamental forces of nature cannot change unless they are affected by the
application of extremes in energy. If enough energy is present, then the
fundamental forces will gradually become unified. This is the main tenet in
supersymmetry. But as witnessed by LENR, the fundamental forces do not behave
in this way. As Rossi states, these forces change when a special type of
magnetism is applied to the fundamental forces of nature. Rossi has picked the
quadrupole magnetic force as the factor that changes the action of the
fundamental forces. This pick is wrong. But informed by other LENR
experimentation, we know that the proper LENR active magnetic force format is
the monopole magnetic force. But we must give him his due, Rossi is very
close to having LENR theory correct in its most basic aspects. On Sat, Apr 1,
2017 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
I am not being snarky. I am just stating something evident. And you seem to
forget that I side with Rossi and I think all is wrong with IH "evidences".
2017-04-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield <[email protected]>:
Why be so snarky? You have no clue when Rossi learnt that. Jumping to
conclusions on such flimsy evidence does nothing for your credibility.
AAOn 3/31/2017 6:10 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Not really a big deal. That's a merely cursory knowledge of particle physics.
He probably learned about this when writing his last paper.
-- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
