On Feb 3, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Basically, ethanol can be viewed as a scheme to rob the taxpayers
and wire transfer the money to Saudi Arabia.
Shows how wrong my thinking can be. I was convinced it was a scheme
to transfer the money to Archer Daniels Midland (ADM).
http://www.admworld.com/naen/fuels/
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-241.html
http://www.taxpayer.net/bailoutwatch/ethanol.htm
any bets on deisel in the future?
http://www.iags.org/n012104t4.htm
To be really efficient at money transfer without producing energy why
not burn shale oil to fuel the ethanol production? At least that
would have a positive effect on the balance of trade. 8^)
