What the Rossi experiments has shown over many years is that LENR in a lattice is not workable because the reaction cannot be controlled. The LENR reaction wants to operate at the boiling point of the metal lattice (nickel) which is 3000K. Rossi has struggled to control the LENR reaction at low temperatures but he always fails because LENR would invariably get to 3000K and meltdown his reactor. So Rossi finally decided to use reactor structural material that doesn't melt at 3000K. This material must be an insulator that does not melt at 3000K. Mills has stumbled on the same reaction and his SunCell runs at the vapor point of silver (2200C). Mills has solved the meltdown problem is another way, he justs runs everything as a liquid without any containment.
Using a lattice for LENR is a losing proposition. The plasma approach to the LENR reaction is the only way to go. I beleive that this tube material is boron nitride, a transparent isolator whose melting point is 3000C. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Time symmetry requires that the laws of nature operate the same when time > goes either forward or backwards. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_translation_symmetry > > To the best of my knowledge, most physicists don't believe that antimatter > is *actually* matter moving backwards in time. It's not even entirely > clear what would it really mean to move backwards in time, from the popular > viewpoint. > > If I'm remembering correctly, this idea all comes from a story that > probably originated with Richard Feynman. At the time, one of the big > puzzles of physics was why all instances of a particular elementary > particle (all electrons, for example) are apparently identical. Feynman had > a very hand-wavy idea that all electrons could in fact be the same > electron, just bouncing back and forth between the beginning of time and > the end. As far as I know, that idea never developed into anything > mathematically grounded, but it did inspire Feynman and others to calculate > what the properties of an electron moving backwards in time would be, in a > certain precise sense that emerges from quantum field theory. What they > came up with was a particle that matched the known properties of the > positron. > > Just to give you a rough idea of what it means for a particle to "move > backwards in time" in the technical sense: in quantum field theory, > particles carry with them amounts of various conserved quantities as they > move. These quantities may include energy, momentum, electric charge, > "flavor," and others. As the particles move, these conserved quantities > produce "currents," which have a direction based on the motion and sign of > the conserved quantity. If you apply the time reversal operator (which is a > purely mathematical concept, not something that actually reverses time), > you reverse the direction of the current flow, which is equivalent to > reversing the sign of the conserved quantity, thus (roughly speaking) > turning the particle into its antiparticle. > > For example, consider electric current: it arises from the movement of > electric charge, and the direction of the current is a product of the > direction of motion of the charge and the sign of the charge. > > Positive charge moving left is equivalent to negative charge moving right. If > you have a current of electrons moving to the right, and you apply the time > reversal operator, it converts the rightward velocity to leftward velocity. > But you would get the exact same result by instead converting the electrons > into positrons and letting them continue to move to the right; either > way, you wind up with the net positive charge flow moving to the right. > > By the way, optional reading if you're interested: there is a very basic > (though hard to prove) theorem in quantum field theory, the TCP theorem, > that says that if you apply the three operations of time reversal, charge > conjugation (switch particles and antiparticles), and parity inversion > (mirroring space), the result should be exactly equivalent to what you > started with. We know from experimental data that, under certain exotic > circumstances, the combination of charge conjugation and parity inversion > does *not* leave all physical processes unchanged, which means that the > same must be true of time reversal: *physics is* not *time-reversal > invariant*. Of course, since we can't *actually* reverse time, we can't > test in exactly what manner this is true. > > The SPP can be compared to the electron in terms of time symmetry breaking > into a positron. The SPP is not LENR active until it has been converted to > its antiparticle by a time reversal operator. That operator is the KERR > effect that changes the rotation of photons inside the whispering gallery > wave. The purpose of the LENR stimulus is to change the nature of the SPP > into its LENR active form. > > > [image: 20170119174546739132.jpg] > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Che <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> IMHO, the person who has done the best work is Keith A. Fredericks at >>> http://restframe.com/ >>> >>> >>> Keith does not know what he is seeing has comes about, but he does >>> understand how the metalized hydride behaves. >>> >>> Keith thinks that the energy loaded metalized hydride crystal is a >>> tachyon. >>> >> >> >> How can time -- motion, that is -- have a 'negative' aspect..? >> >> >> >> >> > >
