Keep in mind that Bose particles are those with 0 or integer intrinsic spin , 
either + or -.   I think the theory for BEC allows for existence of a 
condensate of particles with different integer spin states.  Kim’s theory for 
LENR addresses such  a BEC I believe.

The collapse of a BEC which part of an entangled system—a metal lattice for 
example—may allow transfer of the potential energy of the BEC to the lattice 
phonic (kinetic-energy)  while conserving angular momentum.

Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil<>

Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 9:39 AM
To: vortex-l<>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: f13C or faux13C


therefore decisive

should read

therefore destructive

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Axil Axil 
<<>> wrote:
C12 is a boson and as such is LENR capable. C13 is a fermion and therefore 
decisive to the formation of a bose condensate of atoms. It is reasonable to 
expect that C12 will aid in the production of ultra dense hydrogen.

The same boson characteristic will support the use of lithium that has been 
enriched Li6 over the fermion Li7. All elements used to produce the LENR 
reaction should be a boson which includes hydrogen.

Hydrogen with non-zero spin will not participate in the LENR reaction whereas 
cooper pairs of protons will. Expect LENR reactions centered on pairs of 
protons with zero spin.

Also, as the LERN reaction matures and more NMR active isotopes accumulate, the 
LENR reactor will put out increasing levels or rf radiation derived from the 
nuclear vibrations of the NMR isotope.

This NMR thinking also applies to the nature of the various isotopes of 

Molecular hydrogen occurs in two isomeric forms, one with its two proton spins 
aligned parallel (orthohydrogen), the other with its two proton spins aligned 
antiparallel (parahydrogen). At room temperature and thermal equilibrium, 
hydrogen consists of approximately 75% orthohydrogen and 25%  parahydrogen.

Orthohydrogen hydrogen has non zero spin, this is bad for Ni/H LENR because the 
non zero spin wastes magnetic energy by producing RF radiation.Parahydrogen 
hydrogen has zero spin. This is good for Ni/H LENR because this type of 
hydrogen is magnetically inactive.

This is a way to increase parahydrogen hydrogen by using a noble metal catalyst.


Catalytic process for ortho-para hydrogen conversion

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:44 AM, JonesBeene 
<<>> wrote:
Here is a detail which came up earlier – the embedded proton concept works best 
in the context of the Mills’ “hydrino hydride” where the proton and two very 
tight electrons combine into a stable ion which replaces carbon’s innermost 
orbital electron. The innermost orbital of carbon would need to have a binding 
strength which is resonant with dense hydrogen in order to do this so Rydberg 
values come into play.

Holmlid, Mills, Miley, Mayer, Meulenberg and others who have written on the 
subject of dense hydrogen have different thinking on the details. They could 
all be partly correct with Mills being the most accurate for this detail (but 
he does not mention 13C).

The innermost carbon electron is bound at slightly less than 490 eV which is 
exactly the 18th Rydberg multiple… yet it is not clear how significant that 
detail is in the context of coal formation.


In prior thread, the premise was suggested that there are two different species 
(allotropes) of carbon which are being called carbon-13. One of the two species 
is the normal isotope with 7 neutrons, but the second is carbon-12 with a 
deeply embedded proton of UDH (the ultra-dense hydrogen) of Holmlid.

This result has happened with some types of carbon during the 100 million year 
formation process of decay from ancient vegetation under pressure in coal beds, 
especially anthracite and mineral graphite. This type of coal is often used to 
manufacture the kinds of graphite where physical anomalies have been witnessed.

Here is another piece of evidence which points to a thermal anomaly with carbon 
which could be explained with this hypothesis. (Thanks to Can for the link)

The Replication of an Experiment Which Produced Anomalous Excess 
More on those details later…


Reply via email to