I think Svensmark was the dirt to come up with this theory and he made a good 
video describing it here:
(You can skip the first 2:20 of pretty pictures)

The source of hurricanes seems to be a combination of a cooler upper atmosphere 
and warmer sea surface.  The temperature difference drives the formation.  It's 
not just warmer water.




-----Original Message-----
From: Axil Axil <>
To: vortex-l <>
Sent: Fri, Sep 8, 2017 2:58 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sunspots, hurricanes and dense hydrogen


Enhancement of cloud formation by droplet charging

Shea & Smart (1995) also demonstrated ion production associated with a solar 
proton event in a surface ionization chamber, at Cheltenham, Maryland (398 N). 
This ionization was explained to be caused by muons, i.e. secondary particles 
generated from the solar protons. Other sources of high-energy particles in the 
lower atmosphere include thunderstorms (Wilson 1925; Lidvansky 2003), from 
which there is surface experimental evidence for accelerated electrons 
(Khaerdinov et al. 2005).


Increased cloud formation and electrification of the atmosphere could be an as 
yet unrecognized consequence of prolific use of LENR in petawatt level power 
production. It is a good bet that LENR produces muons as a primary format of 
nuclear energy reformulation. Heat generation is only a minor energy pathway. 

If LENR gains traction as a primary source for global energy production, the 
atmosphere could experience a massive increase in water droplet ionization and 
electrical charge amplification from LENR moderated muon creation. 

Muons from a LENR reactor can send very energetic muons high into the 
atmosphere where their interaction with water vapor is inevitable. This could 
result in a permanent  loss in global fair weather conditions in a permanently 
overcast world.  The deployed base of solar panel power production could be 
rendered ineffectual and the gloomy cloud shrouded earth could enter a new 
epoch of global cooling as little heat or light would penetrate to reach the 

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Bob Higgins <> wrote:

What most people don't know also is that the cosmic ray flux affects the 
weather.  Galactic cosmic rays are variable and depend in part on our solar 
system's orbital position in the spiral arm.  Cosmic rays variably affect the 
weather by penetration into the lower atmosphere, nucleating water droplets, 
and hence forming clouds.  The amount of cosmogenic cloud formation depends on 
the cosmic ray rate and average energy.  

Solar activity varies the solar magnetic field which changes the Earth's 
magnetic field, and hence the Earth's magnetic protection from cosmic rays.  Of 
course, greater solar activity also affects the rate of solar generated high 
energy particles which behave similarly to cosmic rays.

Increased cosmic ray/solar particle flux causes more clouds and causes a net 
cooling on the Earth.  Increased solar magnetic fields cause increased Earth's 
magnetic fields that shield from cosmic rays.  So, increased solar magnetic 
fields means less clouds on Earth and higher temperatures on the Earth.  

As I understand it, the link between solar magnetic fields, solar particle 
flux, cosmic ray flux, and clouds is not part of present climate models.

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:16 AM, JonesBeene <> wrote:

Periodically, the cross connection between abnormal solar activity and 
hurricanes is mentioned in the ALT-SCI press.
Of course this year is no exception as the strongest storm in a decade and the 
strongest solar flares in the past 11 year cycle are aligned in time.
It is a complex interaction but there seems to be something beyond coincidence 
going on in this alignment. Often water temperature is said to play a role in 
hurricanes, but this year the Ocean water temperature in hurricane alley is 
Perhaps the sunspot itself is not the driving force for more intense storms on 
earth but instead, the sunspot feeds a greater tonnage of dense hydrogen into 
the solar wind, and that dense hydrogen becomes the driving mechanism for the 
extra power of the storm.

Reply via email to